Chapter 11 Synthesis: Biogeographic and Macroevolutionary Implicaitons

Brown begins this chapter with giving us a brief overview of the ecological limits on geographic ranges. Boundaries of species are determined by ecological limits. These ecological limits are defined by the interactions between niche requirements of the individual and the abiotic and biotic characteristics of their environment. Three points about the ecology of range boundaries are pointed out: First, these ranges are dynamic; they fluctuate in space and time. Second, environmental conditions that set these ranges are defined by biogeographers as barriers. These barriers can follow two hypothesis: the disperalist or vicariance hypothesis. The third point states that all range boundaries are ultimately set by abiotic conditions. Brown then goes into some detail about the importance of "history". Specifically, the history of a place that has lead to it's characteristic components it is today. And the history of lineage; which is the sequence of speciation and extinction that has occurred since the descent from a common ancestor.
The next part of the chapter Brown discusses macroevolutionary and macroecological implications. The term macroevolution was coined in the 1970's by some paleontologists to be the large-scale, long-term patterns and processes in the evolution of lineages revealed to us through the fossil record. The macroevolutionary research program centered itself around two concepts: punctuated equilibrium, and species selection. The concept of species selection is what Brown likes to call species dynamics. Species dynamics is natural selection operating on the individual level. Darwin's four conditions of evolutionary change persist at the level of an individual, and if these conditions are met then descent with modification (aka natural selection, or speciation) will occur. Three major evolutionary forces act on individuals: drift, migration, and selection. Among these three selection can be considered the most complex force playing on a species. This is where we see "emergent" traits acting on species selection. Brown states that emergent traits can be mean body mass, sex ratio, age structure, variance in male reproductive success, average population density, area of geographic range, and time from divergence of most closely related species. Thinking about emergent traits, could we say that everything about that species physiology and morphology is made up of emergent traits? Or basically, what makes a species it's unique self is made up of emergent traits? I think so, however this emergent trait must allow positive benefits for future generations in order for it to be considered emergent, do you agree?
This brings us to macroecology and the environmental filter. Looking into the fossil record there is evidence for species selection. There is also evidence as to what traits are associated with success or failure of a given lineage. My personal favorite is the explosive speciation of Cichlid fishes in the Great Lakes of Central Africa. Whenever species selection does occur, it is the environment that determines whether this species will persist, will have to move its range, or it will become extinct. The mechanisms that act on a species to determine whether they survive, have a background extinction, or they undergo mass extinction depends largely on the dynamics of the individuals. Such mechanisms include body size, generalist or specialist characteristics, but overall the species ability to evolve accordingly. I will end this summary with my favorite quote from the chapter: "To a large extent, the game of life played by all organisms is a competitive contest to obtain a share of this productivity, and relative success is measured by the size of the share". I apologize this summary is scattered and not good, #1 I wanted to summarize every detail given to us and didn't know where to start, and #2 a lot of this chapter I wanted to discuss with everyone instead of blogging it!
____________________________________________________________________

Biogeography and Evolution of Abies (Pinaceae) in the Mediterranean Basin: the Roles of Long-term Climatic Change and Glacial Refugi
Juan Carlos Linares
Journal of Biogeography 2011, Vol. 38 pg's 619-630

Coolest thing about this article: It took microecological studies and made a macroecological compilation on the evolution of Abies species. I thought it was appropriate considering we discussed in class last week the call to compile small scale studies into a macro assessment! Linares summarized current data on the origin and evolution of genus Abies in the Mediterranean basin and made a comprehensive analysis regarding the isolation and speciation patterns of the firs found in this basin. He reviewed all the studies on Abies genus in the Mediterranean, primarily focusing on morphology, molecular ecology, phytosociology, and biogeography present today and in the fossil record. He found that Abies have undergone evolutionary changes that don't necessarily point to reproductive isolation being the mechanism behind this. He did find that long-term dryness caused an initial Miocene-Pliocene speciation event. And in the Pleistocene, the glacial cycles forced species migrations to occur and caused contact to be repeated and constant between fir species. I thought this paper was a bit on the wordy side and slightly confusing to a non-plant lover. However, its maybe appropriate to include the plants and not talk about animals all the time!

Sorry about the late and scattered post! See you guys tomorrow!

Comments

  1. How does only having the extant taxa affect patterns we see across phyla? Specifically, can you predict where they should have existed? Does making the wrong inference cause problems when doing studies that control for phylogeny? I don’t think I am articulating myself well; I will try better in class.

    Is there no example of anagenesis in the fossil record? I think Dr. Brown nailed it when he mentioned that it’s probably really hard to find ancestors of species and recognize anagenesis. Instead, we’re only going to see the end (successful) result.

    I agree that just because selection can act at a lower level means that a trait cannot be emergent at a higher level.However, I do not think that emergent traits have to be beneficial on future generations.

    This paper does a good job showing speciation in conjunction with geographical changes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ok, this one was a little wordy. And what exactly is paleopany-whatsits...?
    How much of the speciation is due to interbreeding as opposed to trait selection? Would the populations that get isolated develop different traits not only based on the ratio of genes in the population, but also because of the benefit of having a certain trait. I think so.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't know if it was lack of sleep or the article itself, but I had a difficult time with this paper.
    What I will say though is that plant phylogenies can be very complicated because closely related (sometimes not so close) can exchange genetic information. I think that the conclusion that "distantly related" species have similar morphology is an interesting result of this study.

    I really wish that the methods had been elaborated on. I have no idea what they did, or if this is just a synthesis of all the results and hypotheses from other papers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I want to spend some more time today talking about punctuated equilibrium, because I think it's still an interesting problem in paleontology/evolution. It makes me think about other debates I've learned about in biology over the years. My thought on the matter is that, when you have a dichotomy of ideas about how a process works, often the answer is somewhere in between the two, or it's both, or it's neither. I love a good literature catfight as much as the next researcher, but I wonder if it isn't a waste of our time.

    I'd also like to take some time to discuss the concept of emergence. Emergence is when you have a character that is obvious in a group, but isn't apparent when you study that group's components. We're talking about this in terms of geographic ranges of species, but you could also study the crystalline structure of snowflakes or the intricate networks formed by facebook friends of all the students in a graduating high school class. Therefore, not all the properties of a species are emergent - for example, individuals within a species each have a certain morphology. The morphological distribution is where the emergent behavior may lie. There may be characters of species that show no emergent behavior - for example, all humans have two eyes. Nothing emergent there - the character is the same at the individual and species level.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also, @ Kat - palaeopalynology - study of fossil pollen.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also had some confusion with emergent properties when it comes to the chapter. As far as the article is concerned I had some trouble understanding it. Its nice that they note the important influences that anthropogenic fragmentation has had on the extinction risks. Not only that but how humans are impacting climate changes that have helped shape the biogeography of these species.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts